Employee Lifetime Value Explained

November 8, 2024

Over the last several years we've seen the "workplace" as we know it change, transform, change again and continue its continuous transformation at a pace we've never seen before. Organizations are constantly looking for ways to ensure their teams are adaptable and able to outperform their competitors. We measure performance primarily through performance reviews, and this method of evaluation not only–often–misses the mark on accurately reflecting employee performance, but it also leaves out important context: understanding the cumulative value each employee contributes over their entire tenure.

Employee Lifetime Value (ELTV), a concept inspired by a critical commerical side metric, Customer Lifetime Value (CLTV), and helps us assess and maximize the impact of employees on a company’s success.

What is Employee Lifetime Value (ELTV)?

Employee Lifetime Value (ELTV) is the total value an employee created for an organization from the day they start until their last working day. Like CLTV, which measures the total revenue a customer brings to a business over their relationship, ELTV considers revenue per employee over their tenure, making it a relevant metric to capture each employee's sustained contribution, as well as company health and performance.

At its core, ELTV is calculated as:

ELTV = Revenue per Employee × Average Tenure

This simple formula reveals the lasting financial impact of an employee on the company. By using ELTV, organizations can go beyond annual performance snapshots, gaining insight into how an employee’s value compounds over time.

Why ELTV Matters

Traditional performance metrics, often focused on annual or biannual reviews, capture only momentary snapshots of an employee's productivity. ELTV, however, looks at long-term employee contributions and emphasizes continuous growth, career progression, and skill development.

My friend, Jessica Zwaan has also thought extensively about ELTV and points out that People teams often struggle when requesting resources because they don't frame their asks in revenue terms: "In People, we have a bad habit of asking for things without using the words 'so that'. And when we do, we often say things which don't sound clear to CEOs, 'so that we can improve engagement' or 'so that we can offer management training'... These don't sound so good juxtaposed against Sales coming with a, 'so that we can increase revenue by 5%.'" ELTV provides a framework to shift this conversation from cost-center thinking to revenue-impact language.

Where Current Performance Measurement Falls Short

Despite decades of effort to improve performance management, the tools and frameworks commonly used today—like the bell curve and the 9-box grid—often fail to address the complexities of modern workplaces and the nuance of employee performance. These systems may have been effective in a different era, but they now pose significant limitations that hinder employee development and organizational growth.

The bell curve, or forced ranking system, assumes that a small number of employees are top performers, most are average, and a small number underperform. While this approach might work for grading in a classroom, it falters in workplace settings where collaboration, innovation, and individual strengths are key. By forcing employees into predetermined categories, the bell curve can:

  • Undermine Morale: Employees who consistently deliver results but are classified as "average" due to forced distribution can feel undervalued.
  • Foster Competition over Collaboration: Colleagues may compete for limited “top performer” slots instead of working together, which hurts team dynamics and can lead to politics
  • Tolerate Mediocraty: Assumes the majority are average performers, doesn't set an expectation for sustained high performance

The 9-box grid, often used in talent reviews, evaluates employees based on their current performance and perceived potential. While it provides a structured way to discuss talent, it has its own challenges:

  • Subjective Bias: Assessments of “potential” are done by managers who may not know how to assess, and so, labeling can be influenced by bias and favouritism
  • Static View: Provides a snapshot in time but fails to reflect an employee’s dynamic growth or changes in their role, it's also hard to get "out of the box", employees confined to vauge tables
  • Limited Development Focus: Employees categorized as “low potential” or “steady performers” may be overlooked for growth opportunities, creating a self-fulfilling prophecy

The Problem with Traditional Models

Both the bell curve and the 9-box fail to align the continuous, objective and real-time performance calibration. They focus more on categorization than accelerating growth, and both are dependent on qualitative performance data which is often already quite subjective. These tools for evaluating talent also:

  • Lack Real-Time Insights: Data is collected once or twice yearly, making it difficult to address performance trends as they emerge.
  • Overlook Long-Term Value: Traditional models fail to recognize the compounding value of investing in an employee’s development over time.
  • Reinforce Bias and Inequity: Without intentional design to reduce bias, these tools can perpetuate unfair outcomes, particularly for underrepresented groups.
Pando Employee Growth Score

The Future of Performance Measurement is Continuous

At Pando we advocate for understanding what an employee's impact looks like overtime, and having a more clear understanding of that can help you move from the traditional question of "who are my top performers?" to "how do I get the most people performing the best?" Implementing Continuous Performance Calibration can help you understand what the growth rate and trajectory if of individuals in a non-biased, quantitative way which lends itself to real-time optimization and improvement vs. annual or bi-annual "corrections."

How Companies Can Optimize ELTV

Maximizing ELTV requires a shift from static performance reviews to a continuous, just-in-time evaluation approach. Here are three critical strategies for enhancing ELTV:

  1. Shorten Ramp Time: The sooner an employee reaches full productivity, the greater their lifetime value. Implementing structured onboarding and tailored growth pathways can significantly reduce ramp time, allowing employees to contribute meaningfully much earlier in their tenure.
  2. Focus on Continuous Growth: Growth isn't just about retention; it's about creating opportunities for employees to upskill and move forward in their careers. By fostering a culture of ongoing learning and providing clear progression frameworks, companies can ensure that employees continue to grow throughout their careers.
  3. Extend Tenure through Engagement: Employee engagement is essential to ELTV. When employees feel valued and have clear opportunities for advancement, they are more likely to stay with the organization longer. This reduces turnover costs and allows companies to benefit from seasoned, fully integrated employees.

A Path Compounding Returns

Employee Lifetime Value represents more than just a performance metric; it's the foundation for a philosophy that prioritizes continuous improvement, growth, and equitable progression. By focusing on ELTV, organizations can unlock compounding benefits, enabling each employee to reach their fullest potential and drive lasting impact within the organization. Measuring against a metric like ELTV is the key to sustained growth and creating a more nuanced understanding of true employee value.

SHARE THIS ARTICLE
More thoughts from the Pando Blog
View all Articles